The Radiation Dose and Scattered Radiation in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography Examination at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Abstract

This research work measured radiation doses (RD) and the variation of scattered radiation (SR) from the incident radiation to the critical organs such as chest, abdomen, skull and pelvic for commonly performed paediatric patients undergoing Computerized Tomography (CT) examinations using well calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF-100) attached to the skin in the path of the primary X-ray beam. Two hundred and fifty eight (258) paediatric patients were studied.  The values of the equivalent dose for abdominal CT scan ranged from 23.49 - 55. 26mSv; skill CT scan ranged from 10.07 – 69.94mSv and chest CT scan ranged from 8.60 – 31.94mSv. The chest has the highest SR dose of 37.31 mSv when the incident radiation dose to the pelvic is 38.61 mSv.  Pelvic has the least SR dose of 0.21 mSv when the skull has corresponding incident RD of 69.94 mSv.  The work showed that the choice of exposure parameter should be reviewed.

Country : Nigeria

1 Aborisade C.A.2 Famurewa O.C.3 Ibitoye F.I.4 BalogunF.A.

  1. Lecturer and Researcher, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Obafemi Awolowo University, (OAU), Ile-Ife. Nigeria
  2. Department of Radiology, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
  3. Center for Energy Research and Development, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
  4. Lecturer and Researcher, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. Nigeria

IRJIET, Volume 3, Issue 2, February 2019 pp. 1-5

References

  1. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and14 other countries. Lancet 363:345-351.
  2. Appleton M B and Stephen C R. Radiation protection in a neonatal intensive care unit: a practical approach, Radiography 1984; 50:137–41.
  3. ICRP-International Commission on Radiological Protection.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Annals of the ICRP 1991; 21 (1-3).
  4. Ware D E, Huda W, Mergo P J., (1999) Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations.  Radiology 210: 645–650.
  5. Faulkner, K. &Moores, B. M., (1982). An assessment of the radiation dose received by staff using fluoroscopic equipment. British Journal of Radiology, 55, 272-276.
  6. Jeans, S. P., Faulkner, K., Love, H. G. &Bardsley, R. A.,(1985). An investigation of the radiation dose to staff during cardiac radiological studies. British Journal of Radiology, 58,419-428.
  7. LAW, J., (1985). Doses to head and arms of radiologists during fluoroscopy. British Journal of Radiology, 58, 187-188.
  8. PALMER, K. E. & WRIGHT, I. H., (1985). Eye dose limits and the use of over couch and under couch X-ray image intensifier systems. British Journal of Radiology, 58, 1221-1223.
  9. N. W. Marshall and K. Faulkner; (1992), The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology. British Journal of Radiology. 65, 44-49.
  10. Walter Juda, Kent M. Ogden; (2008), Computing effective doses to pediatric patients undergoing body CT examinations. Pediart.Radiol.38:415-423.
  11. Walter Huda and Awais Vance; (2007), Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. AJR, 188540-546.
  12. Kennedy E. V., Iball G. R., and Brettle D. S.; (2007), investigation into the effects of lead shielding for fetal dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiograpy. The British journal of radioody, 80, 631-638.