Load Carrying Capacity of Square and Circular Composite Columns under Axial Loading

Abstract

Load carrying capacity of composite columns under axial loading is the main goal of this research. For that purpose, some tests on steel columns of square and circular section filled with normal and lightweight concrete were tested to investigate the load capacity of such columns under axial loadings. Comparisons between Normal and lightweight concrete filled steel columns for different columns cross sections using Euro Code 4 were carried out. The test results appeared that both types of concrete filled columns failed due to overall buckling, while hollow steel columns failed due to local buckling. The circular columns show greater load carrying capacity than other sections regarding to its confinement for the same modulus of elasticity. According to the said results, the further interest should be taken onto the replacement of the normal concrete by any type of lightweight concrete due to its low specific gravity.

Country : Jordan

1 Shehdeh Ghannam

  1. Assistant Professor, Jerash University, Jordan

IRJIET, Volume 3, Issue 6, June 2019 pp. 37-41

References

  1. Commission of the European Communities, Eurocode 4, 1985. Common Unified rules for Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, Brussles, Bulguium.
  2. Hajjar ,J.F. and Gourly , B.C. 1996. Representation of concrete filled steel tube cross section strength. Journal of structural engineering, 122(11):1327-1336.
  3. Hunaiti (1997), Strength of composite sections with foamed and lightweight aggregate concrete. ASCE Journal of materials in civil engineering, 9(2): 58-61.
  4. Brauns J., 1998. Analysis of stress state in concrete-filled steel column. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 49(1999) : 189-196.
  5. Teng, J.G., Yao, J. and Zhao, Y.2003, Distortional Buckling of Channel Beam-Column. Thin Walled Structures, 41: 595-617.
  6. Zhang, W. and Shahrooz, B.M. 1999. Comparison between ACI and AISC for Concrete-Filled Tubular Columns. Journal of Structural Engg. 125(11):1213-1223.
  7. Han, L.-H.; Yao, G.-H. and Zhao, X.-L. 2004. Behaviour and calculation on concrete-filled steel CHS (Circular Hollow Section) beam-columns, Steel and Composite Structures 4(3): 169–188.
  8. Hunaiti, Y. M. 2003. Aging effect on bond strength in composite sections, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE 6(4): 469–473.
  9. Wang, Y., Wu, H. C., and Li, V. C., 2000, "Concrete Reinforcement with Recycled Rubbers." Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 12(4), 314-319.
  10. British Standard Institute. 1979 BS5400, Part 5, Concrete and Composite Bridges, London, U.K.
  11. Ghannam, S.; Jawad, Y. A. and Hunaiti, Y. 2004. Failure of lightweight aggregate concrete-filled steel tubular columns, Steel and Composite Structures 4(1): 1–8.
  12. Vidula S. Sohoni, Dr.M.R.Shiyekar, Concrete–Steel Composite Beams of a Framed Structure for Enhancement in Earthquake Resistance. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 3(1), 2012, pp.99–110.
  13. Hunaiti, Y. M. 2003. Aging effect on bond strength in composite sections, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.