Crack Growth Study in Welded Sheet Metal

Abstract

This paper presents results of research on the propagation of fatigue cracks in structural steel sheet, subjected to a MIG welding process. The study was conducted on rectangular test pieces with 62.5 x 60 mm and 2 mm thick, MIG welded and non-welded. Samples were tested for fatigue crack propagation at the base material and welded metal. The results show a crack stop in the heat affected zone (HAZ), requiring greater amplitude of the stress intensity factor (KI) so the crack could propagate in a stable manner. Results indicate that the combination of adequate microstructure and residual stress in the HAZ are those factors which can stop the advance of the crack in MIG welded material. 

Country : México

1 José L. Ramírez Cruz2 Homero Jiménez Rabiela3 Benjamín Vázquez González4 Gustavo A. Bravo Acosta5 Pedro García Segura

  1. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Av. San Pablo Xalpa180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, México
  2. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Av. San Pablo Xalpa180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, México
  3. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Av. San Pablo Xalpa180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, México
  4. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Av. San Pablo Xalpa180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, México
  5. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Av. San Pablo Xalpa180, Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas, Azcapotzalco, México

IRJIET, Volume 5, Issue 8, August 2021 pp. 56-60

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2021.508009

References

  1. K. Krishnaprasad, K. Raghu and V. Prakash. 2009. “Fatigue crack growth behavior in dissimilar metal weldment of stainless s steel and carbon steel”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, no. 56, pp. 873 – 879, 2009.
  2. H. Park, and Byong-Whi Lee. 2000, “Effect of specimen thickness on fatigue crack growth rate”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, no. 197, pp. 197–203, 2000.
  3. O. Araque, andA. Nelson, A,“Estado del Arte sobre la Integridad Estructural de Uniones Soldadas y Modelos de Propagación de Grietas para la Gestión de Vida en Estructuras”, Ingeniare, vol. 21, no.2, pp: 279-292, 2013.
  4. N. Sura, and V. Mittal, “Experimental study on effects of process parameters on HAZ of plain carbon steel using GMAW”, International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167-170, 2015.
  5. S. Romero, J. Jairo andO. Flórez, “Influencia de la transferencia en la resistencia y dureza de las uniones soldadas obtenidas por el proceso de soldadura GMAW”,Revista de Ingeniería, no. 37, pp. 38-45, 2012.
  6. A. Chattopadhyay, G. Glinka, M. El-Zein, J. Qian. and R. Formas, “Stress Analysis and Fatigue of welded structures”, Weld World, no. 55: pp. 2-21, 2011.
  7. T. Okawa, T. Nose, H. Shimanuki, and T. Suzuki, “Fatigue Life Prediction of Welded Structures Based on Crack Growth Analysis”, Nippon Steel Technical Report, no. 102, pp. 51-56, 2013.
  8. X. Ye, Y. Su and J. Han, “A State of the Art Review on Fatigue Life Assessment of Steel Bridges”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, pp. 1-13, 2014.
  9. M. Aygul, “Fatigue Analysis of Welded Structures Using the Finite Element Method”, Engineering diss., Chalmers University of Technology, 2012.
  10. N. Arzola, N. and E. Hernández, “Experimental characterization of fatigue strength in butt welded joint considering the geometry and the effect of cooling rate of the weld”, Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, pp. 843, 2017.
  11. H. K. Kathib, B. Mansouri and A. Yeznasni, “Fatigue Strength Analysis of Welded Joints Using an Experimental Approach Based on Static Characterization Tests”, Contemporary Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 513-530, 2016.
  12. A. Sadiq, “Study the Effect of Welding Joint Location on the Fatigue Strength and Fatigue Life for Steel Weldment”, Asian Transactions on Engineering, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 38-45, 2012.
  13. P. Stasius, A.Karolczuk and W. Kuczko, “Analysis of Correlation between Stresses and Fatigue Lives of Welded Steel Specimens Based on Real Three-Dimensional Weld Geometry”, ActaMechanica et Automatica, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12-16, 2016.
  14. J. Carrera, and J. Ramírez, “A Dynamical Model for Fracture Advance Using Stress Analysis and Empirical Crack – Growth Velocity. Part 1. The Model”, International Journal of Engineering Innovation & Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 467-471, 2013.
  15. J. Ramírez and J. Carrera, “A Dynamical Model for Fracture Advance Using Stress Analysis and Empirical Crack - Growth Velocity. Part 2. The Experimental Design”, International Journal of Engineering Innovation & Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 472-475, 2013.
  16. American Society for Testing and Materials,“E 8M – 00, Standard Test Method for Testing of Metallic Materials [Metric]”, ASTM, 2000.
  17. American Society for Testing and Materials,“E 647 - 05 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates”, ASTM,2005.
  18. J. L. González, 2004,“Mecánica de Fractura, bases y aplicaciones”, Limusa- Noriega, 2004.
  19. Y. Shi, B. Chen and J. Zhan, “Effects of welding residual stress on fatigue crack growth behavior in butt welds of a pipeline steel”, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, no.36, pp. 893 – 902, 1990.
  20. D. Atehortua, R. Catacolí, Y.Aguilar, H.Sánchez and I.Sabirov, “Development of a physical simulation method of steel welds for fatigue crack propagation”, Facultad de Ingeniería, vol. 25, no. 42, pp. 33-54, 2016.
  21. I. Satoshi, T. Sadasu and A. Ohmori, 2015. Effect of Microstructure on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate".  JFE Technical Report 20, 2015.
  22. P. Stasius, A.Karolczuk and W. Kuczko, “Analysis of Correlation between Stresses and Fatigue Lives of Welded Steel Specimens Based on Real Three-Dimensional Weld Geometry”, ActaMechanica et Automatica, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12-16, 2016.