Technological Acceptance (TA) of the Internet of Things (IoT) in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria

Abstract

The study aimed to find out the readiness and the competence of academic staff in tertiary institutions to use the Internet of Things in instruction delivery process, as well as to identify the acceptance of students in tertiary institutions to use this technology in the teaching and learning process. A sample size of fifty (50) academic staff and sixty (60) students was used for the study. In the course of this study, the researcher used a self-made questionnaire. The statistical method used in data analysis in this research was the simple mean. A mean value of 2.50 and above on a scale of 5.00 was set as high enough to affirm a particular question in the questionnaire, whereas mean values of less than  2.50 was seen as not enough to affirm such question.  The importance of this research lies in the fact that it afforded a background and firsthand information on acceptability and the nature of Internet of things (IoT) that can be implemented in tertiary institutions, in addition to providing decision makers responsible for the educational process with basic information related to the effectiveness of the use of modern technology in education, then developing the educational process in line with modern technologies, and the requirements of the modern era. This study came out with a set of results, the most important of which are that academic staff and students have positive motivations for using internet of things in educational process. The study further recommended that in addition to providing internet of things devices in academic institutions, regular training is a necessity to ensure a complete integration of modern technology in to the teaching and learning process in tertiary institutions.

Country : Nigeria

1 Ekoro Ekoro Igo2 Ekuma James Nkorabon3 MOMODU Mustapha

  1. Department of Computer Science Education, Cross River State College of Education, Akamkpa, Nigeria
  2. Computer Science Department, Federal Polytechnic, Idah, Kogi State, Nigeria
  3. Department of Computer Science, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, Nigeria

IRJIET, Volume 6, Issue 10, October 2022 pp. 1-8

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2022.610001

References

  1. Amadin F. I, Egwuatu J. O., Obienu A. C & Osazuwa W.A (2017). Internet of Things (IoT): Implications of a Wide Scale Use in Nigeria. Journal of Computing, Information Systems, Development Informatics & Allied Research Journal. 8(1).
  2. Adetoun, S & Kolawole, A. A. (2010). Influence of self-efficacy, perceived ease of use and Perceived usefulness on e-library usage by academic staff in Nigerian universities. In Proceedings of papers presented at the Second Professional Summit on Information Science and Technology (49-55).
  3. Agarwal, R. & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. Journal of MIS Quarterly, 24 (665-694).
  4. Al-Aklabi, A. T., (2017). IOT applications in information institutions.       Retrieved from: https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-773499
  5. Alandjani, G., Pervez, S. & Rehman, S. (2018).Role of Internet of Thıngs (IoT). Higher Education, Proceedings of ADVED 2018- 4th International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences, 15-17 October 2018- Istanbul, Turkey. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328477764_role_of_internet_of_things_iot_in_higher_education
  6. Al-Harbi, R. & Al-Amry, H., (2019). Internet of things at school, available at: https://shmsprod.s3.amazonaws.com/media/editor
  7. Bamigboye, F. O., &Ademola, E. O (2016). Internet of Things (IoT): It’s Application for Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 6th iSTEAMS Multidisciplinary Cross Border Conference University of Professional Studies, Accra Ghana. (621-628).
  8. Banica, L., Burtescu, E. & Enescu, F. (2017). The impact of Internet of Things in higher Education. Scientific Bulletin – Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, 16(1), 53-59. Retrieved from: http://economic.upit.ro/
  9. Brady A. (2014). The Internet of Things and Education: The McGraw Center for Teaching and Learning. Princeton University.
  10. Castellani, A. P.; Bui, N.; Casari, P.; Rossi, M.; Shelby, Z.; & Zorzi, M. (2010). Architecture and protocols for the Internet of Things: A case study. Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops) 8th IEEE International Conference, (678-683).
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of               Information technology. MIS Quarterly (13), 319-340.
  12. El-Dahshan, G. (2019). Employing Internet of Things in Education. International Journal of Research in Educational Sciences. (IJRES), 2(3), 49 - 92. Retrieved from https://iafh.net/index.php/IJRES/article/view/121
  13. Global Standard Initiatives (2015): Internet of Things Global Standards Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITUT/gsi/iot/Pages/default.aspx
  14. Gul, S., Asif, M., Ahmad, S. Yasir, M., Majid, M. &Malik, M. (2017). A Survey on Role of Internet of Things in Education. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. (17)  5 (159–165).
  15. Huansheng N & Ziou W. (2011) Future Internet of Things Architecture: Like Mankind Neural System or Social Organization Framework? IEEE Communications Letters 15(4): 461-463.
  16. Kopetz, H., (2011). Internet of things: design principles for distributed embedded applications, Real Time System Series. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur. 4 (307-323).
  17. Lu, T. & Neng, W., (2010). Future Internet: The Internet of Things. 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE) 5: 376–380. doi:10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579543.
  18. Mershad, K., & Wakim, P. (2018). A Learning Management System Enhanced with Internet of Things Applications. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(3), 23.
  19. Miao, W., Ting-Jie, L., Fei-Yang, L., Jing, S., & Hui-Ying, D (2010). Research on the Architecture of Internet of Things: Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE), 2010 3rd International Conference. 5(484-487).
  20. Michelle S., Ana S., & Jim Buchan (2013). Education and the Internet of Everything: How Ubiquitous Connectedness Can Help Transform Pedagogy Cisco Consulting Services and Cisco Team. https://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/education/education internet.pdf
  21. Noor, F., Anna, A., & Leelanayagi, R. (2014). The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Goods and Service Tax (GST) Application System. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 8(17): 1911-1916.
  22. Osisanwo, F., Izang, A., Kuyoro, S., & John, H. (2016). Internet of Things (IoTs) Bridging the Gap in Tertiary Educational Process. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT).
  23. Pruet, P., Ang, C., & Farzin, D. (2014). Understanding tablet computer usage among primary School students in underdeveloped areas: Students’ technology experience, learning styles and attitudes. Journal of Comput. Hum. Behav. 9(12-26).
  24. Zebra Global (2015) not the classroom you know: Internet of Things and Education. Available at http://blogs.zebra.com/possibilities-education