Cyberbiosecurity as the Foremost Biological Weapon to the Digital World

Abstract

Cyberbiosecurity has emerged as a new field combining cybersecurity and biosecurity. The convergence of cybersecurity and biosecurity can potentially impact the digital operations of enterprises in a variety of industries, including agriculture, manufacturing, and healthcare. This systematic review summarizes and synthesizes research on the increasing importance of cyber-biosecurity threats and the importance of cyber-biosecurity measures in combating the misuse of cyberspace and bioscience technology. The author performed three distinct searches through ProQuest, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases. The author used keywords to identify 15 articles that met the systematic review’s purpose. Analysis of the 15 articles revealed that the intersection of current advancements in biosciences with conventional cyberspace security risks has promoted the awareness and discovery of threats in the cyberbiosecurity field. The author concludes that cybersecurity is the foremost biological weapon to the digital world when challenged by new technologies and security threats. As a result, cyberbiosecurity measures must safeguard the bioeconomy and address the possibility for or actual misuse of critical information, materials, and systems at the convergence of biosciences and cyberspace. Stakeholders interested in cyberbiosecurity outcomes need to be competent in its implementation.

Country : USA

1 Dr. Alex Mathew2 Hannah Alex

  1. Department of Cybersecurity, Bethany College, USA
  2. Brooke High School, USA

IRJIET, Volume 6, Issue 2, February 2022 pp. 75-79

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2022.602013

References

  1. J. Peccoud, J. E. Gallegos, R. Murch, W. G. Buchholz and S. Raman, "Cyberbiosecurity: From naive risk to awareness," Trends in Biotechnology, vol. xx, no. yy, pp. 1-4, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.012.
  2. R. Murch and D. DiEuliis, "Editorial: Mapping the cyberbiosecurity enterprise," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 235, pp. 1-2, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00235.
  3. L. C. Richardson, N. D. Connell, S. M. Lewis, E. Pauwels, and R. S. Murch, "Cyberbiosecurity: A Call for Cooperation in a new threat landscape," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 99, pp. 1-5, 2019,  doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099
  4. R. S. Murch, W. K. So, W. G. Buchholz, S. Raman, and J. Peccoud, "Cyberbiosecurity: An emerging new discipline to help safeguard the bioeconomy," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 39, pp. 1-6, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00039.
  5. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, "Safeguarding the Bioeconomy," The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2020, doi:10.17226/25525.
  6. D. S. Schabacker, L.-A. Levy, N. J. Evans, J. M. Fowler, and E. A. Dickey, "Assessing cyberbiosecurity vulnerabilities and infrastructure resilience," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 61, pp. 1-12, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00061.
  7. K. Millett, E. d. Santos and P. D. Millett, "Cyber-biosecurity risk perceptions in the biotech sector," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 136, pp. 1-4, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00136.
  8. S. Mueller, "Facing the 2020 Pandemic: What does cyberbiosecurity want us to know to safeguard the future?," Biosafety and Health, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 11-21, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.bsheal.2020.09.007.
  9. P. F. Walsh, C. Haggenmiller and T. Franke, "Threats, Risks, and Vulnerabilities At the Intersection of Digital, Bio, and Health," Scientific and Academic Publishing, Walldorf, 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352478030_Threats_Risks_and_Vulnerabilities_At_the_Intersection_of_Digital_Bio_and_Health
  10. S. R. Jordan, S. L. Fenn and B. B. Shannon, "Transparency as Threat at the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Cyberbiosecurity," IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2020, doi: 10.1109/MC.2020.2995578.
  11. J. L. Mantle, J. Rammohan, E. F. Romantseva, l. J. T. Welch, L. R. Kauffman, J. McCarthy, J. Schiel, J. C. Baker, E. A. Strychalski, K. C. Rogers, and K. H. Lee, "Cyberbiosecurity for biopharmaceutical products," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 116, pp. 1-7, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00116.
  12. J. C. Reed and N. Dunaway, "Cyberbiosecurity implications for the laboratory of the future," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. xx, no. yy, pp. 1-27, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00182
  13. A.M. George, "The national security implications of cyberbiosecurity," Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 51, pp. 1-4, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00051.
  14. B. C. Wintle, C. R. Boehm, C. Rhodes, J. C. Molloy, P. Millett, L. Adam, R. Breitling, R. Carlson, R. Casagrande, M. Dando, R. Doubleday, E. Drexler, T. E. Brett Edwards, N. G. Evans, R. Hammond, J. Hasseloff, L. Kahl, T. Kuiken, B. R. Lichman, C. A. Matthewman, J. A. Napier, S. S. ÓhÉigeartaigh, N. J. Patron, E. Perello, P. Shapira, J. Tait, E. Takano and W. J. Sutherland, "A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering," Elife, vol. 6, no. 30247, pp. 1-21, 2017, doi: 10.7554/eLife.30247.
  15. L. C. Richardson, S. M. Lewis, and R. N. Burnette, "Building capacity for cyberbiosecurity training," Frontiers in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 7, no. 112, pp. 1-5, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00112