Analysis of Vendor Selection Decision Support System Using Analytical Hierarchy Process Method in Procurement of Spare Part Goods at PT Djakarta Lloyd (PERSERO)

Abstract

This paper discusses the analytic hierarchy process method for decision-making from multi-criteria and is used to solve complex problems in vendor selection. The identified criteria were used in conjunction with the theoretical concepts from AHP only and the "Expert Choice" computerized software program based on AHP in carrying out the development of the vendor selection model. This study aims to use this approach to be able to build a vendor selection system using the priority weight values of the criteria for quality, price, warranty, and delivery time. The researcher used a questionnaire to several users from the fleet and operations division. From this research, it is known that the warranty is the highest weighting criterion among the existing criteria with a value of 0.300 of all criteria, followed by the criteria for quality of goods with a value of 0.265 and the criteria for delivery time with a value of 0.242, and the price criteria with a value of 0.194. From this research, it is also known that PT KMI was chosen as the top supplier because it has the highest value weight.

Country : Indonesia

1 Bayu Dwi Nugroho2 Sugiyono Madelan

  1. University of Mercu Buana, Faculty of Economics and Business, Jakarta, Indonesia
  2. University of Mercu Buana, Faculty of Economics and Business, Jakarta, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 6, Issue 8, August 2022 pp. 36-41

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2022.608006

References

  1. Chankong and Y. Y. Haimes (1983) Multiobjective Decision Making Theory and Methodology.
  2. Chopra, S. and Meindl, P. (2007) No Title, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planningand Operasion, 2nd or 3rd Edition.
  3. Firdaus, A.F., Madelan, S. and Saluy, A.B. (2021) ‘Supplier / Partnership Selection System Analysis Based on Analytic Hierarchy Method Process in Oil and Gas Drilling Project (Case Study: PT. KMI)’, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 6(3), pp. 403–411, ISSN 2456-2165.
  4. Golmohammadi, M., Cubero, J., Peñalver, J., Quesada, J. M., López, M. M., & Llop, P. (2007) ‘Diagnosis of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri, causal agent of citrus canker, in commercial fruits by isolation and PCR-based methods’.
  5. Juli Astuti, E.F. (2017) ‘EVALUASI PEMILIHAN PENYEDIA JASA KURIR BERDASARKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)’, EVALUASI PEMILIHAN PENYEDIA JASA KURIR BERDASARKAN METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP).
  6. Malczewski, J. (1999) ‘GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons’, GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. John Wiley and Sons [Preprint].
  7. T. C. Carter (2003) ‘No Title’, Supplier Relationship Management: Models, Considerations and Implications for DOD.