Student Learning and Assessment Support System

Abstract

Education is a cornerstone of human development, and advancements in technology have opened new avenues for enhancing learning experiences. In the context of primary education, where foundational knowledge is established, integrating cutting-edge technology can have a profound impact. This system introduces an innovative integrated educational system consisting of four distinct elements, all aimed at improving primary students' learning outcomes within the subject of Environmental Science. The first involves a training module that integrates subject-specific questions and answers. The model presents questions visually and audibly, allowing students to answer using either a keyboard or image upload. The system evaluates responses, calculates scores, and offers corrective feedback for incorrectly answered questions, fostering comprehension. In the second element, a chatbot-based model addresses students' syllabus-related queries. Utilizing voice control and grammar correction, the system provides accurate answers and distinguishes non-syllabus inquiries. Repetitive queries prompt detailed responses with examples, promoting personalized learning and boosting confidence. The third focuses on recommending tutorial videos based on students' knowledge levels. Using quiz scores, the model categorizes students as beginners, intermediates, or advanced learners, and suggests appropriate tutorial videos to facilitate targeted skill development. Lastly, the game suggestion utilizes a quiz-based approach to tailor game recommendations. By selecting lessons and responding to related quizzes, students' performance is evaluated. The system then suggests skill-enhancing games aligned with their proficiency level, reinforcing lesson-based knowledge. This integrated system offers a multifaceted approach to education, combining interactive questioning, AI-driven clarification, tutorial video recommendations, and gamified learning. This approach cultivates personalized learning journeys, fosters engagement, and empowers primary students in mastering Environmental Science concepts.

Country : Sri Lanka

1 Yathurshan. P2 Aishwarya. K3 R.M.D.G. Gimhani4 Janani. K5 Ms. Suriyaa Kumari6 Mr. N.H.P. Ravi Supunya Swarnakantha

  1. Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  2. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  3. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  4. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  5. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  6. Department of Information Technology, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2023 pp. 123-130

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.710016

References

  1. R. E. Mayer, “Multimedia Learning,” 2009, doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811678.
  2. A.Canales, A. Peña, R. Peredo, H. Sossa, and A. Gutiérrez, “Adaptive and intelligent web-based education system: Towards an integral architecture and framework,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1076–1089, Nov. 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.034.
  3. P. Black and D. Wiliam, “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 81–90, Sep. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119.
  4. Johnson, A., et al. (2019). Enhancing Learning with AI-Powered Chatbots. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 245-260.https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i2.331.
  5. Smith, E., & Lee, H. (2020). Context-Aware Chatbots for Subject-Specific Learning Support. International Conference on Educational Technology, 121-135.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3.
  6. Garcia, M., & Martinez, L. (2018). Voice Control Interfaces for Inclusive Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300608.
  7. Alıncaki, F. (2016). Evaluation of opinions of primary school teachers on the method of education with game. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science,doi: https://doi.org/10.7822/egt88.
  8. Undisclosed authors. (Year). Educational computer games and student attitudes. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.027.
  9. Ninković, N., Marić, S., & Kapamadžija, A. (2020). The impact of student response systems on academic achievement. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.594261.
  10. C. Ou, D. A. Joyner, and A. K. Goel, “Designing and Developing Videos for Online Learning: A Seven-Principle Model,” Online Learning, vol. 23, no. 2, Jun. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1449.
  11. S. Hettiarachchi, B. Damayanthi, S. Heenkenda, D. Dissanayake, M. Ranagalage, and L. Ananda, “Student Satisfaction with Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study at State Universities in Sri Lanka,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 11749, Oct. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111749.