Utilizing Ultrasonic Guided Waves for the Early Age Assessment of Concrete Strength and Hardening: Review Paper

Abstract

Monitoring the early age strength and hardening of concrete plays a crucial role in ensuring the structural integrity and durability of concrete structures. Ultrasonic guided waves have emerged as a promising non-destructive testing technique for assessing concrete properties. This review paper aims to provide an overview of the utilization of ultrasonic guided waves for the early age assessment of concrete strength and hardening. The paper begins by discussing the fundamental principles of ultrasonic guided waves and their interaction with concrete materials. It highlights the advantages of using guided waves, such as their ability to propagate over long distances and penetrate through concrete structures. The review then explores various techniques employed for generating and detecting guided waves, including piezoelectric transducers, air-coupled transducers, and laser-ultrasonics. Furthermore, the paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the different parameters that can be extracted from ultrasonic signals to assess the early age strength and hardening of concrete. These parameters include wave velocity, attenuation, reflection, and scattering characteristics. The influence of various factors, such as moisture content, temperature, and mixture proportions, on the ultrasonic response of concrete is also discussed. Moreover, the review discusses the challenges and limitations associated with the application of ultrasonic guided waves in early age concrete assessment. It addresses issues such as signal interpretation, wave dispersion, and the presence of air voids. Additionally, recent advancements in signal processing techniques and data interpretation methods are highlighted. In conclusion, the utilization of ultrasonic guided waves for the early age assessment of concrete strength and hardening shows great promise. This review paper provides valuable insights into the current state-of-the-art in this field and offers recommendations for future research directions.

Country : India

1 Dr. Pappu Kumar2 Prof. Onkar Yadav3 Mr. Pappu Dev

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sandip University, Sijoul, Madhubani-847235, Bihar, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sandip University, Sijoul, Madhubani-847235, Bihar, India
  3. Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Sandip University, Sijoul, Madhubani-847235, Bihar, India

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2023 pp. 319-325

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.710043

References

  1. IS 1999 – 1959 (Reaffirmed 1999): Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  2. IS 383 – 1970: Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  3. IS: 10262 – 1982 (Reaffirmed 2004): Recommended Guidelines for Concrete mix design, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  4. IS: 10262 – 2009: Recommended Guidelines for Concrete mix Proportion, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  5. IS: 12269 – 2013: Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  6. IS: 2386 (Part I, III), 1963: Methods of Test for aggregates for Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  7. IS: 4031 (Part 4, 5 and 6) – 1988: Methods of Physical Teats for Hydraulic Cement, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  8. IS: 456 – 2000: Code of practice – Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  9. IS: 516 – 1959 (Reaffirmed 2004): Methods of Test for Strength of Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
  10. Darquennes. Aveline, StéphanieStaquet, Bernard Espion, Olivier Germain and Christian Pierre(2009), “Comparison between different techniques for monitoring setting and hardening of concrete”. NDTCE‟09, Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering Nantes, France, June 30th July 3rd, 2009.
  11. Robeyst, N., Gruyaert, E. & De Belie N. (2007), “Ultrasonic monitoring of setting and hardening behaviour of concrete and mortar with blast-furnace slag cement “ Proceedings 12th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement, Montréal, 2007, T2-03.2 on CDROM.
  12. Zhu, Jinying& Sun, Hongbin. (2015). Monitoring hardening of concrete using ultrasonic guided waves. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 138. 1885-1885. 10.1121/1.4933913.
  13. Lee, Changgil & Park, Seunghee&Bolander, John &Pyo, Sukhoon. (2018). Monitoring the hardening process of ultra high performance concrete using decomposed modes of guided waves. Construction and Building Materials. 163. 267-276. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.042.
  14. Fodil, Narmane & Chemrouk, Mohamed. (2020). Relevance of the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test for Strength Assessment of High Strength Concretes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 960. 032011. 10.1088/1757-899X/960/3/032011.
  15. Loseva, E & Potapov, A &Osokin, A. (2021). Ultrasonic testing of concrete hardening in pile foundations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1728. 012011. 10.1088/1742-6596/1728/1/012011.
  16. Maziejuk, Dorota&Goszczyńska, Barbara. (2021). Assessment of the early-age compressive strength of concrete. BudownictwoiArchitektura. 20. 005-014. 10.35784/bud-arch.2018.
  17. Tran, Tho & Le, Lawrence & Ta, Dean. (2022). Ultrasonic Guided Waves in Bone: A Decade of Advancement in Review. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. PP. 1-1. 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3197095.
  18. Araújo, Rafael & Silva, William &Pires, Tiago & Silva, José. (2022). Compressive strength assessment of high strength concrete after fire using ultrasonic test method. Research, Society and Development. 11. e63111132719. 10.33448/rsd-v11i11.32719.
  19. Rahimi, Mohammad & Zhao, Rongguo&Shafiullah, Sadozai& Zhu, Feng & Ji, Nan & Xu, Lingpeng. (2023). Research on the influence of curing strategies on the compressive strength and hardening behaviour of concrete prepared with Ordinary Portland Cement. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 18. e02045. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02045.
  20. Kumar, P. and Singh, A., 2019. Groundwater contaminant transport modelling for unsaturated media using numerical methods (FEM, FDM). Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng.(IJRTE), 8(7), pp.2277-3878.
  21. Kumar, P., 2023. Detection of air pollution, air quality monitoring, and control using a wireless sensor network. In Recent Advancement of IoT Devices in Pollution Control and Health Applications (pp. 23-28). Woodhead Publishing.
  22. Kumar, P., 2023. IoT-based solid waste management and collection system using infrared sensors. In Recent Advancement of IoT Devices in Pollution Control and Health Applications (pp. 29-36). Woodhead Publishing.
  23. Kumar, S., Parhi, P.K., Kumar, P. et al. Zone-Wise Optimal Operation Policy and Evaluation of System Performance Measures. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 102, 1129–1138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-021-00553-w
  24. Roy, S. and Kumar, P., 2021. Comparative Review of Defluoridation Efficiency in Wastewater. International Journal of Prevention and Control of Industrial Pollution, 7(1), pp.15-21.