Analysis of the Level of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Risk in the Surakarta Furniture Center Building Project

Abstract

Construction activities involve a high level of risk in many ways. The most risky aspect is Occupational Health and Safety (K3). The Surakarta Furniture IKM Sentra Building Project is a 4-storey steel structure, requiring a lot of workers and heavy equipment, so there is a potential risk of industrial accidents. Among other aspects of the implementation of occupational safety and health that must be considered, is an analysis of the level of occupational health and safety risks in such a way as to enable employers to manage or deal with existing risks in such a way. That occupational safety and health risks associated with work are minimized. This paper aims to identify and analyze the level of occupational safety and health (OSH) risks in the Surakarta Furniture IKM Center project. The research method was carried out by interviewing and distributing questionnaires to respondents, namely staff, supervisors, owners, and foremen with reference to PUPR Ministerial Regulation NO 10 of 2021. The identification results obtained 35 OHS risk variables in the Surakarta IKM Furniture Center Project. The results of the analysis of the level of occupational safety and health (OSH) risk in the Surakarta Furniture IKM Center development project obtained work with a high level of risk, namely steel work, therefore the contractor must pay attention to the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) of the work. Starting from using PPE, reminding workers of the dangers in the event of an accident, using safety belts, installing safety lines, installing nets, and outreach about the dangers of steel work.

Country : Indonesia

1 Rafi Jati Kusuma2 Budi Priyanto S.T. M.T.

  1. Civil Engineering Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Indonesia
  2. Civil Engineering Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 4, April 2023 pp. 11-17

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.704003

References

  1. Sabirin M. I. A. (2019). “Analisa Tingkat Risiko Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Pada Kegiatan Kontruksi Pembangunan Gedung Laboratorium BBPOM Samarinda”. eJournal.untag-smd.ac.id, 2019, 1-16.
  2. Ihsan, T., Hamidi, S. A., & Putri, F. A. (2020). Penilaian Risiko dengan Metode HIRADC Pada Pekerjaan Konstruksi Gedung Kebudayaan Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Civronlit Unbari, 5(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.33087/civronlit.v5i2.67.
  3. Peraturan Menteri PUPR Nomor 10 tentang Pedoman Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan Konstruksi, 2021.
  4. BpjsKetenagakerjaan. (2022, Oktober 14). BPJAMSOSTEK Sosialisasikan Pentingnya K3 bagi Pekerja Sektor Perkebunan. Retrieved from https://www.bpjsketenagakerjaan.go.id/berita/28253/BPJAMSOSTEK-Sosialisasikan-Pentingnya-K3-bagi-Pekerja-Sektor-Perkebunan.html.
  5. Makarim, M. F. 2021. (2021). Provinsi Jawa Tengah (IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HIRADC METHOD IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF THE REGIONAL PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL OF CENTRAL JAVA OFFICE BUILDING) IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HIRADC METHOD IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF THE REGIONAL PE.
  6. Hasibuan, A., dkk. 2020. Teknik Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja. Jakarta: Yayasan Kita Menulis
  7. Fitri, S.N. 2016. Implementasi Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja Karyawan Perusahaan Dalam Menghadapi MEA 2016. Jurnal Spread, Vol. 6, No. 1 (hlm 53-62).
  8. Nurul Anwar, Fahmi. Analisis Manajemen Risiko Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Pada Pekerjaan Upper Structure Gedung Bertingkat (Studi Kasus Proyek Skyland City-Jatinangor), Jurnal Konstruksi Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Garut, ISSN : 2302-7312 Vol. 13 No. 1 2014.
  9. Szymański, P 2017, Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208: 174-182.
  10. Wang, W, Wu, Y & Sloan, M 2018, A framework and dynamic model for reform of residential land supply policy in urban China. Habitat International, 82: 28-37.
  11. Ningsih, W., & Ferijani, A. (2020). Deskripsi Pelaksanaan Kesehatan Dan Keselamatan Kerja (K3) Di Perusahaan Panca Jaya. Jemap, 2(2), 267. https://doi.org/10.24167/jemap.v2i2. 2458.