Performance Analysis of HP Heater with Comparison of the Number of Plugging Tubes in a 400 MW Coal-Fired Power Plant

Abstract

Each of Units 1-4 SLA PGU has a capacity of 400 MW and seven feedwater heaters, namely three low-pressure feedwater heaters (LPH 1, 2, and 3), a deaerator, and three high-pressure feedwater heaters (HPH 5, 6, and 7). HPH 5 in Unit 2 has experienced 30% tube plugging, which is equivalent to 480 out of 1579 tubes. Plugging is expected to reduce the performance of HPH. If the plugging exceeds the maximum limit, the HPH needs to be retubed to restore equipment reliability. Furthermore, a comparison of the performance of HPH 5 was calculated with plugging variations of 0%, 22%, and 30% when the unit was at full load. The calculation results of terminal temperature difference (TTD), drain cooler approach (DCA), and log mean temperature difference (LMTD) showed an increase with the increase in plugging in HPH. Meanwhile, the calculation of heat rate and effectiveness showed a decrease caused by the additional plugging in the HPH. The largest heat transfer occurs in the condensing zone of the HPH, where the value is around 80% to 85% of the total heat transfer that occurs. All calculations of the relationship between performance parameters and HPH plugging variations have an R-square value of more than 0.67, indicating a strong relationship.

Country : Indonesia

1 Akbar Dwitama2 Widayat3 M.S.K Tony Suryo Utomo4 Nazaruddin Sinaga

  1. Master of Energy Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50241, Indonesia & Suralaya Power Generation Unit (SLA PGU), PT Indonesia Power, Cilegon, Banten, 42439, Indonesia
  2. Master of Energy Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50241, Indonesia & Chemical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50275, Indonesia
  3. Master of Energy Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50241, Indonesia & Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50275, Indonesia
  4. Master of Energy Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50241, Indonesia & Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Central Java, 50275, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 5, May 2023 pp. 1-10

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.705001

References

  1. DEN, “Laporan Kinerja Sekretariat Jenderal Dewan Energi Nasional 2020,” Jakarta, Jan. 2021.
  2. R. Indrawan, “Hingga Juni 2021 Kapasitas Pembangkit Listrik Indonesia Mencapai 73.341 MW, Komposisi PLTU Mencapai 47%,” Sep. 24, 2021. Accessed: May 18, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dunia-energi.com/hingga-juni-2021-kapasitas-pembangkit-listrik-indonesia-mencapai-73-341-mw-komposisi-pltu-mencapai-47/#:~:text=Hingga%20Juni%202021%20Kapasitas%20Pembangkit,PLTU%20Mencapai%2047%25%20%2D%20Dunia%20Energi
  3. R. Mudassir, “Permintaan Meroket, Harga Batu Bara Acuan Februari 2022 Ditetapkan jadi US$188,38,” Feb. 08, 2022. Accessed: May 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20220208/44/1497913/permintaan-meroket-harga-batu-bara-acuan-februari-2022-ditetapkan-jadi-us18838
  4. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2009 Tentang Konservasi Energi.
  5. B. L. Capehart, W. C. Turner, and W. J. Kennedy, Guide to Energy Management Fifth Edition, 5th ed. London: The Fairmont Press, Inc., 2006.
  6. The British Standards Institution, Energy management systems : requirements with guidance for use., 2012th ed. 2012.
  7. S. A. Wibowo, “Audit Energi Detail Pada PLTU Batubara Dengan Membandingkan Parameter Operasi Aktual Dengan Komisioning,” 2021.
  8. D. Wang, H. Li, C. Wang, Y. Zhou, X. Li, and M. Yang, “Thermodynamic analysis of coal-fired power plant based on the feedwater heater drainage-air preheating system,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 185, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116420.
  9. M. U. Damayanti, D. Budi, U. Kukuh, W. Jurusan, and T. Mesin, “Analisis Termal High Pressure Feedwater Heater di PLTU Suralaya,” JURNAL TEKNIK ITS, vol. 5, no. 2, 2016.
  10. J. Pieterse, “High Pressure Feedwater Heaters Replacement Optimisation Title: Feedwater Heaters Replacement Optimisation,” 2016.
  11. EPRI. (2002). Feedwater Heater Maintenance Guide. www.epri.com.
  12. EPRI. (2010). 2010 Feedwater Heater Technology Conference Proceedings. https://www.epri.com/research/products/1021491
  13. F. Madron, “Modeling a 3-zone Feedwater Heater,” Nov. 2013, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3664.7849.
  14. ASME, “ASME PTC 12.1-2000 Closed Feedwater Heaters,” 2000.
  15. S. Kumareswaran, “Shell and tube heat exchanger design for sulfuric acid manufacturing plant,” 2014, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2721.6720/1.
  16. T. L. Bergman, A. S. Lavine, F. P. Incropera, and D. P. Dewitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer Seventh Edition, 7th ed. 2011.
  17. W. W. Chin, “The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling The Proactive Technology Project Recovery Function: A Methodological Analysis View project Research Methods View project.” [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311766005
  18. Incropera, F. P., & DeWitt, D. P. (2002). Introduction to heat transfer. John Wiley & Sons.
  19. J. P. Holman, Heat Transfer Tenth Edition, 7th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2010.
  20. Kumar, S., et al. (2016). "Performance improvement of feedwater heaters by chemical cleaning." Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9(4), 3176-3180. https://www.jchps.com/issues/v9/i4/60.pdf
  21. Van Maanen, P. J., and Van Nes, J. (2005). "Cleaning of feedwater heaters." Heat Transfer Engineering, 26(10), 26-33.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01457630500246680
  22. Hill, K., and Pulling, D. (2012). "Minimizing feedwater heater fouling in combined cycle power plants." GE Power & Water. https://www.ge.com/power/sites/default/files/products/Downloads/Minimizing%20Feedwater%20Heater%20Fouling%20in%20Combined%20Cycle%20Power%20Plants.pdf