The Influence of Generational Work Values and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Commitment among Young Employees in the UK

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between generational work values, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among young employees in the United Kingdom. Guided by contemporary workforce theories, the research explored whether deeper value alignment provides a more compelling explanation for commitment than traditional satisfaction-based models. A cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from young employees across diverse sectors, and hierarchical regression analysis was employed to determine the relative contributions of the predictors. Findings revealed that generational work values significantly and positively predicted organizational commitment, indicating that employees who perceive strong alignment between their personal values and workplace expectations are more likely to develop enduring attachment to their organizations. Although job satisfaction showed a positive association with commitment in the initial analysis, its effect became non-significant when generational work values were introduced into the model, suggesting that foundational values carry greater weight than surface-level satisfaction for this demographic. The study concludes that value congruence is central to fostering commitment among young employees, particularly in an era of shifting expectations, digital influence, and evolving career identities. It recommends that organizations strengthen culture–value alignment, redesign roles to reflect meaning and flexibility, and prioritize value-based recruitment practices. Limitations include the cross-sectional design and reliance on self-report measures. Future research should adopt longitudinal and multi-method approaches to clarify causal pathways.

Country : Nigeria

1 Dapo Adeniyi, PhD

  1. HCPC Practitioner (UK), Principal Consultant, and Director of Counseling, Phenopatmos Global Consulting, Nigeria

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 12, December 2025 pp. 41-50

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.912006

References

  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
  5. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2021). Gen Z: Perspectives on work and careers. CIPD Publishing.
  6. CIPD. (2021). Youth employment: Learning from employer experiences. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  8. Deloitte. (2022). Gen Z and the future of work: Insights into the next generation of employees. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com
  9. Deloitte. (2022). Global Gen Z and Millennial survey 2022. Deloitte Insights. (Report)
  10. Kadiri, I., & Amadasun, T. (2020). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among bank employees in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting and Management, 15(2), 45–58. https://jam-ilorin.org.ng
  11. Karatepe, O. M., & Sökmen, A. (2006). The effects of work–family conflict, emotional exhaustion, and supervisor support on job outcomes of hotel employees. Tourism Management, 27(5), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.04.008
  12. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
  13. Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913
  14. Mathieu, J. E., Kukenberger, M. R., D’Innocenzo, L., & Reilly, G. (2019). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 435–451.
  15. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
  16. Ng, T. W. H., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the Millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292.
  17. Shore, L. M., & Martin, G. (2006). Organizational commitment. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of human resource management (pp. 81–104). Blackwell.
  18. Soenanta, A., Yulianto, A., & Prasetyo, H. (2020). The role of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in employee retention: A study in the Indonesian manufacturing sector. Journal of Management Studies, 8(3), 112–128. https://journalissues.org
  19. Tarigan, V., & Ariani, D. W. (2015). The effect of work satisfaction and work motivation on employee performance through organizational commitment. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00042-1
  20. Tnay, O. (2013). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of turnover intention among production employees. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 100–110. http://www.ijbssnet.com
  21. Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
  22. UJM. (2016). [Various studies on mediation of job satisfaction and organisational commitment]. University Journal of Management. http://www.hrpub.org
  23. Van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 571–584.