Root Cause Analysis of Jacket Cable of Aerobridge

Abstract

Large moving facilities at airports, such as aerobridges, utilize a specific cable management system known as a cable chain, which houses power cables used to deliver electricity to the motors. These cables consist of multiple cores encased in a protective PVC jacket. However, after a relatively short period of operation, field observations revealed that the cable jackets had torn in many units. In most cases, the damage exposed the internal cable cores.

Data collected from the field showed that 17 out of 33 aerobridge units experienced cable failures within just two years of operation. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms behind these failures and to identify their root causes. Understanding the root causes is essential for improving the design, manufacturing process, operational handling, and maintenance practices of the cable system.

The study applied a fishbone diagram and the Five Whys method as its analytical approach. The findings identified three primary root causes: the absence of a guiding system to secure the cable within the chain, the impact of high temperature exposure and the effect of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on the cable jacket.

Country : Indonesia

1 Agus Mandala2 Agus Suprihanto3 Sri Nugroho

  1. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2025 pp. 228-232

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.905030

References

  1. Du, H., Jiang, Q., & Xiong, W. (2022). "Computer-aided optimal design for flexible cable in aerospace products based on dynamic analogy modeling." Scientific Reports, 12(1), 5833.
  2. Na, W. H., Koo, H. J., & Bin, S. Y. (2015). "Study on the Effect of the Lift Column Layout Design on Structural Strength of the Passenger Boarding Bridge." Transactions of the KSME C: Industrial Technology and Innovation, 3(4), 307–312.
  3. Grzechca D, Zieliński D, Filipowski W. (2021) What Is the Effect of Outer Jacket Degradation on the Communication Parameters? A Case Study of the Twisted Pair Cable Applied in the Railway Industry. Energies; 14(4):972.
  4. Zhou, C., Yi, H. and Dong, X. (2017), Review of recent research towards power cable life cycle management. High Voltage, 2: 179-187.
  5. Crawford, R. J., & Martin, P. J. (2020). General properties of plastics. In Plastics Engineering. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
  6. Behera, A.K.; Beck, C.E.; Alsammarae, (1996), A. Cable Aging Phenomena under Accelerated Aging Conditions. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 43, 1889–1893.
  7. Toman, G.J.; Mantey, A. (2012), Cable System Aging Management for Nuclear Power Plants. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation, San Juan, PR, USA, 10–13; pp. 315–318.
  8. Pietsch D, Matthes M, Wieland U, Ihlenfeldt S, Munkelt T. (2024), Root Cause Analysis in Industrial Manufacturing: A Scoping Review of Current Research, Challenges and the Promises of AI-Driven Approaches. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing; 8(6):277.
  9. Reddy, C.C. (2022), A Brief Review of Thermal Mechanism of Failure in Power Cable Insulation, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 15 (SI), 49-62.
  10. Doggett, A. M. (2005). Root cause analysis: A framework for tool selection. The Quality Management Journal, 12(4), 34–45.
  11. Sakdiyah, S.S., Eltivia, N., & Afandi, A. (2022). Root Cause Analysis Using Fishbone Diagram: Company Management Decision Making. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 1(6), 566–576.