Effect of Lime and GGBS on Geotechnical Properties of Fly Ash

Abstract

Fly ash, a fine by product from coal combustion in thermal power plants, constitutes about 80% of the total ash produced, with the rest being bottom ash. In recent years, India has significantly improved its fly ash management. As per national trends for 2023-24, approximately 100% of newly generated fly ash and a large portion of legacy stock have been successfully utilized in construction, reclamation, and soil stabilization activities up from ~61% in 2014-16. This study explores the geotechnical improvement of class-F fly ash, collected from Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., Raipur, by stabilizing it with lime and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS). Fly ash was blended with lime (0%, 2%, 4%, 8%, 12%) and GGBS (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%), resulting in 25 combinations. Standard Proctor tests were performed to determine the optimum moisture content (OMC) and maximum dry density (MDD), followed by unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests after curing for 0, 7, 14, and 28 days at 28 °C. Results indicated that untreated fly ash had high OMC, low MDD, and negligible strength. Lime addition improved compaction and strength with curing. GGBS, when used with lime, enhanced pozzolanic and latent hydraulic reactions, resulting in significantly higher UCS. The best performance was observed at 12% lime and 20% GGBS after 28 days of curing. This confirms that combining lime and GGBS effectively transforms fly ash into a sustainable geotechnical material suitable for sub-base, embankments, and pavement layers.

Country : India

1 Sudhakar Budida2 Parmeshwar Sahu3 Shiva Verma

  1. M.Tech. Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, India
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, India
  3. Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur, India

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 6, June 2025 pp. 195-204

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.906026

References

  1. Al-Rawas, Amer Ali, et al."A comparative evaluation of various additives used in the stabilization of expansive soils." (2002): 199-209.
  2. Hardjito, Djwantoro, et al. "Factors influencing the compressive strength of fly ash- based geopolymer concrete. “civil engineering dimension 6.2 (2004): pp-88.
  3. Kim, Bumjoo, Monica Prezzi, and Rodrigo Salgado. "Geotechnical properties of fly and bottom ash mixtures for use in highway embankments."Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 131.7 (2005): 914-924.
  4. Phanikumar, B. R., and Radhey S. Sharma. "Volume change behavior of fly ash- stabilized clays."Journal of materials in Civil Engineering 19.1 (2007): 67-74.
  5. Reddy, BV Venkatarama, and K. Gourav. "Strength of lime–fly ash compacts using different curing techniques and gypsum additive."Materials and structures44.10 (2011): 1793-1808.
  6. Chithiraputhiran, Sundara Raman. Kinetics of Alkaline Activation of Slag and Fly ash-Slag Systems. Arizona State University, 2012.
  7. Rajesh, D. V. S. P., et al. "Performance of alkali activated slag with various alkali activators."International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology 2 (2013): 378-386.
  8. Saride, Sireesh, Anand J. Puppala, and Srujan R. Chikyala. "Swell-shrink and strength behaviors of lime and cement stabilized expansive organic clays."Applied Clay Science 85 (2013): 39-45.
  9. Pani, Aparupa. Effect of Curing Temperature on the Strength of Lime Stabilized Fly ash. Diss. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, 2014.
  10. Singh, S.P. and A. Sharan."Strength characteristics of compacted pond ash."Geomechanics and Geoengineering 9.1 (2014): 9-17.
  11. Singh, S. P., Swaraj Chowdhury, and Partha Narayan Mishra. "An Experimental Investigation on Strength Characteristics of Alkali Activated Fly ash."Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 11 (2015): 402-409.
  12. Hussain, rounak. "a study on properties of bottom ash-GGBS geopolymer concrete for paver blocks."