Comparison of Power and Efficiency in Synchronous Converter with INC and P&O MPPT Algorithm

Abstract

A maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm optimizes the power output of a solar panel by continuously adjusting the duty cycle based on real-time voltage and current measurements. This process ensures the system operates at the panel’s maximum power point without overloading it. However, maintaining converter stability and fast convergence under varying solar irradiance conditions poses a challenge, as output power can oscillate before stabilizing at the maximum power point. Traditional non-synchronous converters use fast-switching diodes to block reverse current, but in high-current applications, power loss increases significantly due to the diode’s internal resistance. Synchronous converters, by using the MOSFET’s intrinsic body diode, address this issue and enhance efficiency. This paper focuses on comparing the performance and power conversion efficiency of the two converter types, highlighting the improvements in power extraction and efficiency at the maximum power point.

Country : Cambodia

1 MEAS Saran2 AM Sok Chea3 KIM Bunthern4 CHRIN Phok5 NY Virbora6 SRIM Saravuth

  1. Energy Technology and Management (ETM), Institute of Technology of Cambodia (ITC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  2. Energy Technology and Management (ETM), Institute of Technology of Cambodia (ITC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  3. Energy Technology and Management (ETM), Institute of Technology of Cambodia (ITC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  4. Energy Technology and Management (ETM), Institute of Technology of Cambodia (ITC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  5. Faculty of Electronics of National Polytechnic Institute of Cambodia (NPIC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  6. Faculty of Electronics of National Polytechnic Institute of Cambodia (NPIC), Phnom Penh, Cambodia

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 8, August 2025 pp. 31-43

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.908005

References

  1. H. H. Pourasl, R. V. Barenji, and V. M. Khojastehnezhad, “Solar energy status in the world: A comprehensive review,” Energy Reports, vol. 10, pp. 3474–3493, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/J.EGYR.2023.10.022.
  2. K. S. Ong, L. Jiang, and K. C. Lai, “Thermoelectric Energy Conversion,” Comprehensive Energy Systems: Volumes 1-5, vol. 4, pp. 794–815, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809597-3.00433-8.
  3. E. Skoplaki and J. A. Palyvos, “On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: A review of efficiency/power correlations,” Solar Energy, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 614–624, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/J.SOLENER.2008.10.008.
  4. N. Fraidenraich and O. C. Vilela, “Performance of solar systems with non-linear behavior calculated by the utilizability method: application to PV solar pumps,” Solar Energy, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 131–137, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00050-5.
  5. N. A. Kamarzaman and C. W. Tan, “A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 37, pp. 585–598, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2014.05.045.
  6. S. Guo, R. Abbassi, H. Jerbi, A. Rezvani, and K. Suzuki, “Efficient maximum power point tracking for a photovoltaic using hybrid shuffled frog-leaping and pattern search algorithm under changing environmental conditions,” J Clean Prod, vol. 297, p. 126573, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.126573.
  7. A.Hussain, R. Akhtar, B. Ali, S. E. Awan, and S. Iqbal, “A Novel Bidirectional DC–DC Converter with Low Stress and Low Magnitude Ripples for Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Power Systems,” Energies 2019, Vol. 12, Page 2884, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 2884, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/EN12152884.
  8. F. Mumtaz, N. Zaihar Yahaya, S. Tanzim Meraj, B. Singh, R. Kannan, and O. Ibrahim, “Review on non-isolated DC-DC converters and their control techniques for renewable energy applications,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3747–3763, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ASEJ.2021.03.022.
  9. D. G and S. N. Singh, “Selection of non-isolated DC-DC converters for solar photovoltaic system,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 76, pp. 1230–1247, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.130.
  10. T. Sutikno, R. A. Aprilianto, and H. S. Purnama, “Application of non-isolated bidirectional DC–DC converters for renewable and sustainable energy systems: a review,” Clean Energy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 293–311, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1093/CE/ZKAC070.
  11. D. Calasanzio, M. Maja, and P. Spinelli, “Fast charging of lead/acid batteries,” J Power Sources, vol. 46, no. 2–3, pp. 375–381, Oct. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(93)90033-W.
  12. V. Salas, E. Olías, A. Barrado, and A. Lázaro, “Review of the maximum power point tracking algorithms for stand-alone photovoltaic systems,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 1555–1578, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.10.023.
  13. Daniel W. Hart, “Power Electronics.” Accessed: Oct. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mhprofessional.com/power-electronics-9780073380674-usa
  14. John A. Duffie and William A. Beckman, “Solar Radiation,” Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, pp. 3–42, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1002/9781118671603.CH1.
  15. V. Ny, S. Meas, and C. Srun, “Implementation of Synchronous Bidirectional Converter Using a Fuzzy Logic Controller,” Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2023, Volume 11, Page 99, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 99–114, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.11648/J.JEEE.20231105.11.
  16. George Lakkas, “Enterprise Systems Analog Applications Journal MOSFET power losses and how they affect power-supply efficiency,” “Analog Application Journal,” pp. 22–26, 2016.
  17. I.C. Guran, A. Florescu, and L. A. Perișoară, “A Novel ON-State Resistance Modeling Technique for MOSFET Power Switches,” Mathematics 2023, Vol. 11, Page 72, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 72, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/MATH11010072.
  18. I.N. Jiya and R. Gouws, “Overview of Power Electronic Switches: A Summary of the Past, State-of-the-Art and Illumination of the Future,” Micromachines 2020, Vol. 11, Page 1116, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1116, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/MI11121116.
  19. P. Amaral, C. Duarte, and P. Costa, “On the impact of timer resolution in the efficiency optimization of synchronous buck converters,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 693–702, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.11591/IJPEDS.V6.I4.PP693-702.
  20. W. Qiu, S. Mercer, Z. Liang, and G. Miller, “Driver deadtime control and its impact on system stability of synchronous Buck voltage regulator,” IEEE Trans Power Electron, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 163–171, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2007.911784.
  21. I.N. Jiya and R. Gouws, “Overview of Power Electronic Switches: A Summary of the Past, State-of-the-Art and Illumination of the Future,” Micromachines 2020, Vol. 11, Page 1116, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 1116, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/MI11121116.
  22. W. G. Hurley and W. H. Wölfle, “Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications,” Transformers and Inductors for Power Electronics: Theory, Design and Applications, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1002/9781118544648.
  23. Ray Ridley and A. Nace, “Modeling Ferrite Core Losses,” “Switching Power Magazine,” 2006.
  24. R. W. Erickson and D. Maksimović, “Fundamentals of Power Electronics,” Fundamentals of Power Electronics, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43881-4.
  25. D. P. Hohm and M. E. Ropp, “Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms using an experimental, programmable, maximum power point tracking test bed,” Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, vol. 2000-January, pp. 1699–1702, 2000, doi: 10.1109/PVSC.2000.916230.
  26. T. Esram and P. L. Chapman, “Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 439–449, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2006.874230.
  27. A.N.M. Mohammad, M. A. M. Radzi, N. Azis, S. Shafie, and M. A. A. M. Zainuri, “An Enhanced Adaptive Perturb and Observe Technique for Efficient Maximum Power Point Tracking Under Partial Shading Conditions,” Applied Sciences 2020, Vol. 10, Page 3912, vol. 10, no. 11, p. 3912, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/APP10113912.